DOCUMENT: CLS-REBUILD · CLASSIFICATION: PUBLIC METHODOLOGY: SYMMETRIC · STATUS: ACTIVE

← Roster

543
Unfit
CHARACTER CREDIT SCORE · 300–850
19/40
Weak
FOUR PILLARS

Composite 5.05 / 10, weighted per the Constitutional Weight Schedule.

Below the 700 bar, Author's Verdict: not supported.

Lands in the Unfit band at credit 543, below the 700 support line, Author's Verdict: not supported. (See section 7 for the full reasoning.)

★ Service to Country
U.S. Army · Staff Sergeant · 2000–2016

Service to country is honored here as context, not as a score. The character within it informs the pillars where conduct is evidenced, but the badge does not move the composite.

The 14 measures

Each measure is scored 0–10 against an anchored example, with a cited source. Hover/expand why? for the reasoning.

#MeasureScoreWhy
M01 Duty to Constitution & Rule of Law 6
why?
Scored on oath-keeping CONDUCT, not on the certification vote itself (the constitutional objection process is excluded from scoring). Mast objected on the floor to the Arizona and Pennsylvania electoral counts on Jan 6, 2021, a bare floor objection, which is NOT process-subversion capping on its own. He is NOT a confirmed signatory of the Dec 2020 Texas v. Pennsylvania amicus (the Florida House signatories were Bilirakis and Posey; Mast does not appear on the 126-member list), so no criterion-8 flag attaches. Held at a middling 6 rather than higher because of a documented candor drag: in Oct 2024 he publicly minimized the danger to VP Pence on Jan 6 ("wasn't really in peril"), a retrospective downplaying of an attack on the constitutional transfer of power. No affirmative oath-defending stand at personal cost on record to lift it; no capping conduct to sink it. [source]
M02 Party Over Country 7
why?
A genuine cross-aisle working record on his district's core issue. Ranked 32nd most bipartisan in the House in the 115th Congress; authored Everglades/Lake Okeechobee water provisions in the Water Resources Development Act jointly with Sen. Nelson (D), Sen. Rubio (R), and led a save-the-Everglades-program letter with Rep. Wasserman Schultz (D). Real institution-over-tribe conduct on substance, held below the top tier by a sharply partisan posture on national/foreign-policy fights. [source]
M03 Persons of Equal Worth 3
why?
Persons-of-Equal-Worth is the weakest measure on this record. In Oct–Nov 2023 Mast stated terrorism is "absolutely supported by the Palestinian people from elementary school all the way up into the elderly" and argued there are "very few innocent Palestinian civilians," explicitly analogizing them to Nazi-era civilians. This is a documented, repeated dehumanization of an entire civilian population, anti-belonging conduct, not a single heated line. A censure resolution (H.Res.846) was introduced over it (it was not adopted, so it is weighed as a serious appearance/conduct concern, not a finding). Driven to the floor of the band; not zero only because the conduct is concentrated in one wartime advocacy episode rather than a career-spanning habit aimed at domestic citizens. [source]
M04 Weaponization of Justice 6
why?
No documented weaponization of state power against political rivals, and no criterion-8 process-subversion flag attaches (he did not sign the Texas v. PA amicus; a bare floor objection is not capping). Middling rather than high because the record shows no affirmative use of power to restrain abuse either, and his directive forcing official staff communications to substitute "Judea and Samaria" for "West Bank" bends institutional process toward personal ideological framing, a minor abuse-of-position note, not a rights violation. [source]
M05 Incitement / Anti-Belonging 3
why?
Rhetoric measure tracks M03 down. The "very few innocent Palestinian civilians" / Nazi-civilian analogy and the "supported from elementary school to the elderly" framing are dehumanizing language about a whole population. This is a documented rhetorical pattern within the 2023 episode, not an isolated slip. Floored; held off zero because it is bounded to a wartime foreign-policy debate rather than a continuous incitement campaign against domestic opponents or constituents. [source]
M06 Fiduciary Conduct 4
why?
Multiple documented compliance failures. Three separate STOCK Act late-disclosure violations were reported: an up-to-$100K Virgin Galactic purchase (2021), an Ideal Power sale (reported ~18 months late), and an Aphria→Tilray share exchange reported over a year past deadline. Also fined $500 for a House floor mask-rule violation; the Ethics Committee upheld the fine on appeal. These are real rules-of-the-road breaches (disclosure law and chamber rules), not mere appearance, pulling this below the midpoint. Not lower because none reached a finding of corrupt intent or self-enrichment from office information. [source]
M07 Duty to Call Out 4
why?
The active-duty standard is calling out one's OWN side at cost. The record shows the inverse on the defining test: rather than hold his own side accountable for Jan 6, Mast publicly minimized it in 2024, saying Pence "wasn't really in peril." There is genuine bipartisan cooperation on Everglades water (a modest credit), but no documented instance of confronting his own party or leadership when it carried political cost. Below midpoint. [source]
M08 The Discretion Test 6
why?
Discretion test, does he use available power for self-benefit when no one is watching. No documented self-dealing in office; the STOCK Act lapses are timeliness/compliance failures rather than evidence of trading on office information. No affirmative high-mark act of declining a personal advantage on record either. Middling. [source]
M09 The No-Camera Test 5
why?
Private-vs-public consistency. The combative public persona (IDF uniform on Capitol Hill, "partisan clown show" jab at the Ethics Committee, hardline floor rhetoric) appears to match his off-camera posture, there is no documented hypocrisy gap between a moderate private face and a harsh public one. Held at the midpoint because the available record is thin on independently sourced behind-closed-doors conduct either way. [source]
M10 Constituent-vs-Donor Vote 6
why?
Constituent service is a relative strength: persistent, concrete work on the district's signature problem (toxic discharges, Lake Okeechobee, Everglades restoration funding), including bipartisan WRDA provisions. Held just above midpoint rather than higher because national-profile and foreign-policy advocacy (Foreign Affairs chairmanship, Israel focus) increasingly dominate his public bandwidth relative to district needs. [source]
M11 Net-Worth Trajectory 5
why?
Scored ONLY on office-attributable enrichment, not raw wealth. No documented self-dealing, family-payment scheme, office-information trade, or foreign-government revenue. The STOCK Act violations are disclosure-timing failures (scored under M06), not proven enrichment from office knowledge. Absent evidence of office-driven gain, this sits at a neutral midpoint, the late filings prevent a clean high mark by leaving the appearance unresolved. [source]
M12 Floor Decorum 4
why?
Institutional decorum is a documented weak spot. Wore a foreign military (IDF) uniform onto Capitol Hill, a serving member donning another state's uniform in the chamber-adjacent setting strains the dignity of the U.S. office; refused a House floor mask rule and, after losing the appeal, called the bipartisan Ethics Committee a "partisan clown show," attacking the institution that judged him rather than accepting its process. These are repeated decorum/institution-respect lapses. Below midpoint. [source]
M13 Lying & Misleading 5
why?
Truthfulness. The 2024 characterization that Pence "wasn't really in peril" on Jan 6 cuts against the documented record of that day, and the sweeping factual claim that the Palestinian population supports terrorism "from elementary school to the elderly" is an unsupportable generalization. These are framing/ candor concerns rather than a proven sustained falsehood machine, so the measure lands at the midpoint rather than the floor. [source]
M14 Knowledge Depth 7
why?
Substantive competence is a relative strength. Deep first-hand subject command on EOD/defense matters from his Army career, detailed and effective water-infrastructure legislating (authored EAA reservoir / WRDA provisions), and selection as Chairman of House Foreign Affairs reflect institutional substance over pure talking-points. Held below the top tier because the foreign-affairs leadership has also been marked by inflammatory rather than deliberative framing. [source]

Why not higher, the points withheld

The standard is the seat; the ceiling is a perfect 10. Every withheld point traces to documented conduct, weighed where the measures and attributes say it belongs, shown openly here, the same way the earned points are.

WhereDocumented conductMitigation weighed
M03 Oct–Nov 2023 statements that there are 'very few innocent Palestinian civilians' and that terrorism is supported by the Palestinian people 'from elementary school to the elderly,' with a Nazi-civilian analogy; subject of failed censure H.Res.846
↳ Persons of Equal Worth, documented dehumanization of a civilian population
Bounded to a wartime foreign-policy debate; censure not adopted, weighed as conduct concern not finding
M05 Same dehumanizing rhetoric scored as a rhetorical pattern
↳ Rhetoric, anti-belonging language
Confined to the 2023 episode rather than continuous incitement
M06 Three STOCK Act late-disclosure violations (Virgin Galactic, Ideal Power, Aphria→Tilray) plus an upheld $500 mask-rule fine
↳ Rules-of-the-road compliance failures
No finding of corrupt intent or office-information enrichment
M07 Publicly minimized Jan 6 danger to VP Pence in 2024 instead of calling out his own side
↳ Failure of the own-side accountability duty
Genuine bipartisan Everglades cooperation partially offsets
M12 Wore a foreign (IDF) military uniform on Capitol Hill; defied a House mask rule; called the bipartisan Ethics Committee a 'partisan clown show'
↳ Institutional decorum / respect-for-process lapses
None material
M01 2024 downplaying of the Jan 6 threat to the constitutional transfer of power
↳ Oath-keeping candor drag
Bare floor objection only; NOT an amicus signatory, no capping conduct
M13 Pence 'wasn't really in peril' framing and the sweeping 'elementary-school-to-elderly' generalization
↳ Candor / accuracy drag
Framing concerns, not a proven sustained falsehood pattern

The Four Pillars, worthy to be followed?

A separate axis from the 14 measures. The measures ask did their conduct meet the standard; the Pillars ask is this someone worthy to be elevated and followed at all. The two can diverge, when they do, the divergence is the finding.

#PillarScoreWhy
I Trust & Loyalty
  • Would I follow them into uncertainty or adversity?
  • Would I trust them with my life or reputation?
  • Would I trust them to lead others honorably when the stakes are high?
6
why?
Attributes: Courage and Selfless Service are demonstrably real in his military record (EOD technician, double amputee, Bronze Star/Purple Heart), context, not scored, but it informs an authentic conviction. Drag toward Self-Interest from the disclosure-compliance failures keeps it from rising further.
II Aspiration & Integrity
  • Do I admire their values and how they live them?
  • Do they reflect the kind of person I hope to become?
  • Do I feel challenged to be better because of their example?
4
why?
Attributes: Conviction and Authenticity are present, but Self-Reflection and Teachability are weak, the response to the Ethics Committee ('partisan clown show') and the 2024 Jan 6 minimization show institution-blaming rather than self-correction. Pulled toward the Defensiveness/Consistency-failure pole.
III Protection & Influence
  • Would I trust this person to protect what I love most?
  • Would I trust them to influence someone I care deeply about?
  • Would those under their authority be safer and better for it?
5
why?
Attributes: genuine Protection and Stewardship of his district's waterways via real bipartisan WRDA work; offset by the West Bank staff-language directive and a posture that uses the platform for confrontation. Net middle.
IV Legacy & Virtue
  • Would I be proud if my child grew up to be like them?
  • Do they embody the virtues I want carried into the future?
  • If their influence continued in others, would the world be better or worse?
4
why?
Attributes: Integrity drag from STOCK Act lapses and the dehumanizing 2023 rhetoric (Justice / Love of Truth concerns) outweigh the substantive-competence credit. The record carries real public-service substance but also conduct most would not want a child to emulate.
TOTAL: Weak 19/40

Total 19/40, below the midline. Authentic conviction and concrete district substance are real, but dehumanizing wartime rhetoric, repeated compliance failures, and institution-blaming over self-correction hold the character pillars down.

What the Four Pillars are & the questions behind each →

In their own words

“No, ma'am. He's a decent family man... I just happen to have disagreements with on fundamental issues.”

PLACEHOLDER, not a Mast quote; do not render. Retained only as a structural marker pending a sourced Mast civic quote. · n/a · CIVIC · cite

“It is not a far stretch to say there are very few innocent Palestinian civilians.”

House floor, arguing to restrict humanitarian funding to Gaza; analogized Palestinian civilians to Nazi-era civilians · Congressional Record / news coverage Nov 2023 · CONTESTED · cite

“[Pence] wasn't really in peril.”

CNN interview minimizing the danger to VP Pence during the Jan 6 attack · RealClearPolitics / The Hill, Oct 2024 · CONTESTED · cite

“[A] partisan clown show.”

Reaction after the bipartisan House Ethics Committee upheld his $500 mask-rule fine · FloridaPolitics, 2021 · ACCOUNTABILITY · cite

Full personnel file

1. Identity

Brian Jeffery Mast (born July 10, 1980). U.S. Representative for Florida's 21st Congressional District since 2017 (originally FL-18, redistricted to FL-21 in 2023). U.S. Army 2000–2016: enlisted as a combat engineer, later an explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) technician serving with the 28th Ordnance Company alongside the 75th Ranger Regiment. On September 19, 2010, in Kandahar, Afghanistan, he stepped on an IED while clearing a route, losing both legs and his left index finger; awarded the Bronze Star and Purple Heart. Chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs since 2025.

2. Voting / Legislative Profile

Lugar Center / McCourt Bipartisan Index: 32nd most bipartisan House member in the 115th Congress, a genuine cross-aisle record concentrated on water and Everglades policy. Signature substance: Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) reservoir and Lake Okeechobee water-flow provisions in the Water Resources Development Act, developed with Sen. Bill Nelson (D), Sen. Marco Rubio (R), and Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D). Now leads the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Policy positions themselves are NOT scored here; only conduct is graded.

3. Constitutional Moments

Jan 6, 2021: objected on the House floor to the Arizona and Pennsylvania electoral counts. This is recorded as a bare floor objection, the constitutional objection process is excluded from scoring, and it is NOT process-subversion capping. Verified against the Dec 2020 Texas v. Pennsylvania amicus signatory list: Mast is NOT among the 126 House signatories (the Florida signers were Bilirakis and Posey), so no criterion-8 flag attaches. The weighed conduct concern is his 2024 public minimization of the Jan 6 threat to VP Pence, scored as a candor drag on M01/M13, not as capping.

4. Rhetoric & Discourse Profile

The defining rhetorical record is the Oct–Nov 2023 Gaza-war debate, in which Mast stated there are "very few innocent Palestinian civilians," analogized them to Nazi-era civilians, and asserted that terrorism is supported by the Palestinian people "from elementary school all the way up into the elderly." This is documented dehumanization of a civilian population and is the principal driver of the low M03/M05 marks. It prompted a censure resolution (H.Res.846) that was introduced but not adopted; under the evidentiary rule it is weighed as a serious conduct concern, not a finding. Considered for a criterion-10 enemy-making flag but not applied as capping: the conduct is bounded to a wartime foreign-policy advocacy episode rather than a sustained pattern of casting domestic opponents or constituents as enemies who do not belong.

5. Fiduciary Profile

Three documented STOCK Act late-disclosure violations, an up-to-$100K Virgin Galactic purchase (2021), an Ideal Power sale reported roughly 18 months late, and an Aphria→Tilray share exchange reported over a year past deadline, plus an upheld $500 House floor mask-rule fine. These are compliance failures scored under M06; no finding of corrupt intent, self-dealing, family payments, office-information trading, or foreign-government revenue exists, so M11 (office-attributable enrichment) is unaffected and sits neutral.

6. Severity-Class Conduct

No capping criterion-8 (process subversion) flag: Mast did not sign the Texas v. Pennsylvania amicus and a bare Jan 6 floor objection is excluded. Criterion-10 (sustained enemy-making/incitement) was actively considered because of the documented 2023 dehumanizing rhetoric toward Palestinian civilians, but is NOT applied as a capping flag: the conduct is concentrated in a single wartime foreign-policy advocacy episode and the framework excludes policy heat, so it is graded as a severe drag on M03/M05/M13 rather than a terminal flag. Flag count: zero. The low character pillars and conduct band reflect the weighed drags directly.

7. What The Framework Says

Mast brings authentic conviction and a real, sacrificial military record (context, not scored) plus genuine bipartisan substance on his district's water and Everglades problems. Against that, the conduct record carries heavy, documented drags: dehumanizing rhetoric about a civilian population during the 2023 Gaza war, three STOCK Act disclosure violations, an upheld floor-rule fine met with an attack on the Ethics Committee, and a 2024 minimization of the Jan 6 threat instead of holding his own side accountable. No capping flag attaches, he is not an amicus signatory and the enemy-making rhetoric is bounded to a foreign-policy episode, but the weighed conduct lands the record below the bar. Honest middle-to-low: real substance, real character costs.

8. Sources & Where To Look Deeper

Tier 1 (primary): Congress.gov member & bill record (H.Res.846) · House Committee on Ethics statement · House financial disclosures

Tier 2: Lugar Center / McCourt Bipartisan Index · Ballotpedia · RealClearPolitics, Pence Jan 6 interview

Research links: Congress.gov member profile · Ballotpedia · House financial disclosures · Voteview / DW-NOMINATE · Wikipedia

Scores derive from the fixed Constitutional Weight Schedule. The bar does not move. Conduct, not party.

SHARE THIS DOSSIER: