The Civic Leader Scorecard grades 420+ American politicians against a fixed bar derived from the oath of office and the legal-ethics tradition that governs lawyers and judges. The grade is not a partisan judgment. It is a measured placement of documented conduct against an anchored library of historical examples spanning two centuries of American public life, drawn from both parties and across multiple eras.
The bar does not move. The Doctrine of the Seat does not permit the median to be passing. A politician operating at the median of the political class is operating below the standard the office requires.
The methodology rests on three principles. These are the rules. They are not negotiable, not party-dependent, not era-dependent. They apply to every politician in the dossier and every politician we'll add tomorrow.
The standard does not lower because previous holders fell short of it, because peers fall short, because the opposing party falls short, or because the political reward for falling short is high. "It's been done before" is not a defense — it's an indictment that compounds rather than excuses. "The other side does it" is not a defense — it's a confession that the speaker abandoned the standard the moment the other side did.
Public office is a fiduciary position. The same legal-ethics doctrine that governs lawyers and judges governs the politician. The office is held in trust for the citizenry, not for the officeholder. "Not illegal" is not a defense. "Not charged" is not a defense. "Acquitted on technicality" is not a defense. The appearance is the artifact.
In whose interest is the authority being used? If the people as a whole — not Severity. If self, family, party, or faction — Severity. The eight Severity criteria below are specific manifestations of this single underlying principle.
Every politician is scored 0–10 on each of 14 measures against documented historical anchors. Each anchor is sourced from primary records — Congressional Record, special counsel reports, court rulings, financial disclosures. Each score has a symmetric-party comparison at the same level. Cherry-picking is detectable because anchors at every level come from both parties.
When constituent, oath, and party interests conflict, does the oath win? Anchor at Score 9: McCain ACA "skinny" vote, Cheney J6 Committee, Pence Jan 6 certification.
Do they treat opposing voters as fellow citizens or as enemies? Score 3 anchor: Hillary's "deplorables" + Biden's "MAGA Republicans" Philadelphia 2022. Score 2: Trump's "vermin" + "enemy within."
Office held in trust or extracted for personal benefit? Anchor at flag-level: Menendez sale-of-office conviction, Trump Org foreign-state bookings, Clinton Foundation foreign flow during SecState.
Do they publicly call out their own side's misconduct? Score 8-9 anchors: McCain "no ma'am" Lakeville, Cheney J6 Committee, Romney impeachment vote, John Kelly post-WH criticism, Krebs election certification.
Does private conduct match public persona? Score 9: documented private-public consistency. Score 2-3: Trump Raffensperger call, Hillary deplorables hot-mic, Romney 47% fundraiser, Obama "clinging to guns and religion."
Are public statements truthful? Score 2 anchors: Reid 2012 Romney-tax-fabrication (admitted false), RFK Jr sustained vaccine-autism campaign, Trump WaPo 30,573 false claims database 2017-2021, Santos sustained biographical fabrication.
Every politician's record sits at a placement on the bar. These are anchor examples from across the grade range — from those who held the seat at the seat's standard to those who used the seat as a vehicle for self, family, or party. Click any dossier for the full per-measure scorecard with primary-source citations.
Every politician's dossier is independently shareable. The Doctrine of the Seat applied to Republicans, Democrats, Independents, sitting officeholders, former officeholders, deceased anchors, and convicted-or-resigned figures — the same standard for all.
Open Master Roster → Read Full Doctrine