DOCUMENT: CLS-REBUILD · CLASSIFICATION: PUBLIC METHODOLOGY: SYMMETRIC · STATUS: ACTIVE

← Roster

635
Adequate
CHARACTER CREDIT SCORE · 300–850
23/40
Weak
FOUR PILLARS

Composite 6.12 / 10, weighted per the Constitutional Weight Schedule.

Below the 700 bar, Author's Verdict: not supported.

A short and so-far clean in-office record that lands just under the support bar. Downing's first term shows strong floor attendance and genuinely bipartisan legislating (the AI-WISE Act and the Crow Revenue Act, the latter worked with tribal stakeholders), with no documented in-office weaponization, enrichment, or enemy-making. But the composite is held to an Adequate middle by drags counted honestly: a 2018 guilty plea for buying resident hunting and fishing licenses while a non-resident over 2011-2016, a knowing-misrepresentation conviction, not a mere appearance-concern, and seven 2020 campaign-practice violations resolved with corrective action. No capping conduct; the record simply has not yet earned the support threshold. An honest middle, watched as the tenure lengthens.

★ Service to Country
U.S. Air Force / Air National Guard · Veteran · Post-2001 (eight years)

Service to country is honored here as context, not as a score. No conduct measure is moved by the badge; it contextualizes the record without affecting the composite.

The 14 measures

Each measure is scored 0–10 against an anchored example, with a cited source. Hover/expand why? for the reasoning.

#MeasureScoreWhy
M01 Duty to Constitution & Rule of Law 6
why?
No documented defense of constitutional limits at personal cost, and no process-subversion conduct: seated January 2025, Downing could not have signed the December 2020 Texas v. Pennsylvania amicus and has no January 6 certification exposure. The record is short. Middle, neither a constitutional-fidelity high mark nor a subversion drag. [source]
M02 Party Over Country 7
why?
Demonstrated willingness to legislate across the aisle in a short tenure: the AI-WISE Act passed the House with bipartisan support, and the Crow Revenue Act cleared the Natural Resources Committee with bipartisan support and tribal-stakeholder cooperation. Country/institution placed over denying the other side a win. Upper-middle on a thin but positive record. [source]
M03 Persons of Equal Worth 6
why?
No documented anti-belonging conduct toward opponents or constituents. A March 2026 town hall covered contested policy (Iran, the SAVE Act, ICE), scored as policy, not conduct, and not held against him here. Middle: no high-mark dignity defense on record, no documented contempt. [source]
M04 Weaponization of Justice 7
why?
No documented weaponization of state power against rivals or critics, and no process-subversion conduct (no Texas v. PA signature possible, seated 2025; no January 6 exposure). No criterion-class conduct. [source]
M05 Incitement / Anti-Belonging 6
why?
No documented pattern of incitement or enemy-making rhetoric. Town-hall positions tracked partisan talking points but were policy, not conduct, and contained no documented casting of opponents as enemies who do not belong. Middle, restraint on the record, no high-mark moment. [source]
M06 Fiduciary Conduct 5
why?
Montana's Commissioner of Political Practices found seven campaign-practice violations in the 2020 auditor primary, unreported expenditures, missing 'paid for by' attribution, and late Clean Campaign Act notice to opponents. A genuine fiduciary/compliance drag. Partially offset: the campaign replaced its finance/compliance team and vendors and the matter was resolved with corrective action rather than escalating sanction. [source]
M07 Duty to Call Out 6
why?
No documented instance of calling out his own side at cost (the higher active-duty bar), and no documented failure to do so on a defining vote. Short record with strong attendance. Middle, duty neither clearly met nor clearly breached. [source]
M08 The Discretion Test 6
why?
No documented use of office for preferential personal treatment in the federal seat. The 2018 license matter (claiming resident status he was not entitled to) is the closest analogue but predates office and is scored as honesty under M13. Diligence indicator strong: missed only 1 of 517 roll calls (0.2%). Middle-positive. [source]
M09 The No-Camera Test 6
why?
No documented public-versus-private contempt gap; no reporting of an off-camera persona at odds with the public one. Short record, nothing adverse. Middle by default. [source]
M10 Constituent-vs-Donor Vote 6
why?
Legislative focus tracks district concerns (financial sector, Native American affairs, water and public lands) and constituent-facing town halls were held. A late-April 2026 district poll showed 34% approval / 40% disapproval, a representation-quality signal, not a conduct breach. Middle. [source]
M11 Net-Worth Trajectory 7
why?
Scored ONLY on office-attributable enrichment, self-dealing, family payments, office-information trades, or foreign-government revenue. None documented. Downing's wealth derives from pre-office business ventures (a calendar company acquired by Yahoo, insurance and real-estate firms); raw wealth is not penalized. No documented office-driven enrichment. [source]
M12 Floor Decorum 6
why?
No documented breach of institutional decorum or regular order; committee work (Financial Services, Small Business) proceeded through normal process, including bipartisan committee passage of the Crow Revenue Act. Middle-positive on a short record. [source]
M13 Lying & Misleading 4
why?
In 2018 Downing pleaded guilty to obtaining resident hunting and fishing licenses as a non-resident and to unlawfully procuring a license, for conduct spanning 2011-2016 ($2,110 fine, 18-month license forfeiture, one-year deferred sentence). This is a conviction for knowing misrepresentation of residency repeated across years, a documented honesty drag, not a mere appearance-concern. Partial mitigation: he attributed the residency listing to accountants' tax-filing errors, and it predates federal office. The honest middle-low reflects a real, adjudicated integrity finding tempered by its pre-office vintage and no in-office recurrence. [source]
M14 Knowledge Depth 7
why?
Substantive command in his lane: four years as Montana State Auditor (insurance/securities regulator) and authored, finance-focused legislation (the AI-WISE Act on small-business AI adoption). Substance over talking points on financial-services matters. Upper-middle. [source]

Why not higher, the points withheld

The standard is the seat; the ceiling is a perfect 10. Every withheld point traces to documented conduct, weighed where the measures and attributes say it belongs, shown openly here, the same way the earned points are.

WhereDocumented conductMitigation weighed
M13 2018 guilty plea to obtaining resident hunting/fishing licenses as a non-resident and unlawfully procuring a license, for conduct spanning 2011-2016; $2,110 fine, 18-month license forfeiture, one-year deferred sentence
↳ Honesty / Love of Truth, adjudicated knowing misrepresentation of residency
Attributed to accountants' tax-filing errors; predates federal office; no in-office recurrence
M06 MT Commissioner of Political Practices found seven 2020 campaign-practice violations (unreported expenditures, missing 'paid for by' attribution, late Clean Campaign Act notice)
↳ Fiduciary / transparency-compliance drag
Campaign replaced finance/compliance team and vendors; resolved with corrective action, not escalating sanction
M10 Late-April/early-May 2026 district poll: 34% approval, 40% disapproval among MT-2 registered voters
↳ Representation-quality signal (not a conduct breach)
-
Pillar II The license-residency conviction is a documented break from a clean-integrity claim (Authenticity/Consistency)
↳ Integrity/Consistency drag
Pre-office; no documented in-office recurrence
Pillar IV License conviction + seven campaign-practice violations sit on the legacy as integrity asterisks
↳ Integrity/Justice drag
Both pre-office and resolved; short in-office record otherwise clean

The Four Pillars, worthy to be followed?

A separate axis from the 14 measures. The measures ask did their conduct meet the standard; the Pillars ask is this someone worthy to be elevated and followed at all. The two can diverge, when they do, the divergence is the finding.

#PillarScoreWhy
I Trust & Loyalty
  • Would I follow them into uncertainty or adversity?
  • Would I trust them with my life or reputation?
  • Would I trust them to lead others honorably when the stakes are high?
6
why?
Attributes: Selfless Service, Steadiness, Reliability, military service and strong floor attendance (1 of 517 missed) show diligence; short tenure limits evidence of courage-at-cost. No documented drag toward Self-Interest or Collapse in office. Middle.
II Aspiration & Integrity
  • Do I admire their values and how they live them?
  • Do they reflect the kind of person I hope to become?
  • Do I feel challenged to be better because of their example?
5
why?
Attributes: Authenticity, Self-Reflection, Teachability, held below middle by a real integrity drag: the 2018 license-residency conviction and the 2020 campaign-practice violations. Partial self-correction (vendor/compliance-team replacement) keeps it at 5 rather than lower; both are pre-office.
III Protection & Influence
  • Would I trust this person to protect what I love most?
  • Would I trust them to influence someone I care deeply about?
  • Would those under their authority be safer and better for it?
6
why?
Attributes: Stewardship, Accountability, Protection, bipartisan legislating (AI-WISE Act, Crow Revenue Act with tribal stakeholders) shows constructive use of the seat; no documented Exploitation or weaponization. Middle.
IV Legacy & Virtue
  • Would I be proud if my child grew up to be like them?
  • Do they embody the virtues I want carried into the future?
  • If their influence continued in others, would the world be better or worse?
6
why?
Attributes: Integrity, Justice, Love of Truth, a short, mostly clean in-office legacy carrying two pre-office integrity asterisks (license conviction, campaign violations). Real drags toward Favoritism/Ego that temper but do not define the record. Middle.
TOTAL: Weak 23/40

Total 23/40, Adequate. The pillars hold near the middle: a thin but constructive in-office record pulled down by genuine pre-office integrity drags, neither of which has recurred in the federal seat.

What the Four Pillars are & the questions behind each →

In their own words

“The AI-WISE Act will help our small businesses harness artificial intelligence to compete and grow.”

On House passage of the bipartisan AI-WISE Act (H.R. 5784) · Quiver Quantitative press summary · CIVIC · cite

“These were mistakes made by accountants who prepared my taxes and listed me as a California resident.”

Defense after pleading guilty to obtaining resident hunting/fishing licenses as a non-resident · Billings Gazette / AP · CONTESTED · cite

Full personnel file

1. Identity

Troy Bryan Downing. U.S. Representative for Montana's 2nd congressional district since January 3, 2025 (first term, 119th Congress). Previously Montana State Auditor (insurance/securities commissioner) 2021-2025. Air Force / Air National Guard veteran (CSAR squadron, two Afghanistan tours). Businessman: founded WebCal (acquired by Yahoo), plus insurance and commercial-real-estate firms; earlier a research scientist/educator at NYU's Courant Institute. Member, House Financial Services Committee and House Committee on Small Business.

2. Voting / Legislative Profile

First-term Republican on House Financial Services and Small Business. Sponsorship focus: Finance/Financial Sector (~47%), Native American affairs (~18%), water resources, energy, and public lands. Bipartisan architecture in a short tenure: the AI-WISE Act (H.R. 5784, small-business AI adoption) passed the House with bipartisan support; the Crow Revenue Act (H.R. 725) cleared House Natural Resources with bipartisan support and tribal-stakeholder cooperation. Floor attendance: missed 1 of 517 roll calls (0.2%) through April 2026. Contested policy positions stated at a March 2026 town hall are recorded as policy and NOT scored in either direction, per the framework's refusal to grade policy.

3. Constitutional Moments

Short record with no defining constitutional-fidelity moment yet, and no process-subversion exposure: seated January 2025, Downing could not have signed the December 2020 Texas v. Pennsylvania amicus and has no January 6 certification vote on record. No documented stand against constitutional limits and none in defense of them at personal cost. Watched as the record lengthens.

4. Rhetoric & Discourse Profile

No documented pattern of incitement or enemy-making. Public rhetoric in 2025-2026 tracked partisan policy talking points (Iran, the SAVE Act, immigration enforcement) at a March 2026 town hall, scored as policy, not conduct. No documented casting of opponents or citizens as enemies who do not belong. Middle: restraint on the record without a high-mark dignity-defense moment.

5. Fiduciary Profile

No documented office-attributable enrichment, self-dealing, family payments, office-information trades, or foreign-government revenue in the federal seat; wealth derives from pre-office business ventures and is not penalized as raw wealth. The genuine fiduciary drag is pre-office: a July 2020 Commissioner of Political Practices finding of seven campaign-practice violations (unreported expenditures, missing attribution, late Clean Campaign Act notice), resolved with corrective action after the campaign replaced its compliance team. Separately, a 2018 guilty plea for non-resident license fraud is weighed under honesty (M13), not enrichment.

6. Severity-Class Conduct

No documented Severity-class conduct under any of the eight criteria. Seated January 2025, Downing has no Texas v. Pennsylvania amicus signature and no January 6 certification exposure (Criterion 8), and no documented pattern of enemy-making or incitement (Criterion 10). The pre-office license conviction and campaign-practice violations are weighed as ordinary integrity/fiduciary drags, not Severity flags. Flag count: zero.

7. What The Framework Says

A short first-term record that, in office, is clean and quietly constructive: strong attendance, two bipartisan bills (one worked with tribal stakeholders), and no documented weaponization, enrichment, or enemy-making. The standard counts the real drags honestly, a 2018 conviction for buying resident licenses he was not entitled to, an adjudicated knowing-misrepresentation finding, and seven 2020 campaign-practice violations, both pre-office and neither recurring in the federal seat. Those temper the record without sinking it. Adequate, and watched as the tenure lengthens.

8. Sources & Where To Look Deeper

Tier 1 (primary): Congress.gov member profile · MT Commissioner of Political Practices (2020 finding, via MTPR)

Tier 2: Billings Gazette / AP, 2018 hunting-license guilty plea · Daily Montanan, March 2026 town hall

Research links: Congress.gov member profile · Ballotpedia · GovTrack · House Personal Financial Disclosure (LegiStorm) · Wikipedia

Scores derive from the fixed Constitutional Weight Schedule. The bar does not move. Conduct, not party.

SHARE THIS DOSSIER: